Moderators: Bazz, Lord Golbez
Pretty much, I pillowed up the description to hold into account some ugly mofos are considered hot by some people and vice versa. So yeah, the ugliest person in your opinion.Damien wrote:I don't quite understand.
By every single physical pet peeve imaginable, do you mean the ugliest person alive?
Think about this way, if you don't answer you'll die. That always gets my gears going.Lord Golbez wrote:Both options are ridiculous. I'd rather be on my own than either, obviously, so why the hell would I choose?
But what if you put the hot person's brain into the ugly person's body by accident? Then what will you do? And let me tell you competent hit men are surprisingly expensive.Cybernetic Empire wrote:Swap their brains. You can do it in about an hour from the comfort of pretty much any kitchen or garage.
[spoiler=:ono]Unless it is from Entr0pi3, clearlyBazz wrote:Not that I'm saying I dislike intellegence in a woman, far from it, but an explaination of some scientific concept is rarely cute no matter who says it.
[/spoiler] I'd pretty much rather die anyway.LittleDrummerGirl wrote:Think about this way, if you don't answer you'll die. That always gets my gears going.Lord Golbez wrote:Both options are ridiculous. I'd rather be on my own than either, obviously, so why the hell would I choose?
I did say rarelyChi wrote:[spoiler=:ono]Unless it is from Entr0pi3, clearlyBazz wrote:Not that I'm saying I dislike intellegence in a woman, far from it, but an explaination of some scientific concept is rarely cute no matter who says it.
Yeah, it starts at an early age I think, you need to find a balance between socialising and studying. I pretty much went 90% on the social side, as in if I could do the work without having to expend any time or effort learning it then I'd do it, if not I'd decide that it was more important to have fun. On the flip side I'd imagine the hardcore academics (the beardy jumper wearers) willing to socialise providing it takes place somewhere they would be anyway but not willing to expend any effort pursuing it. Those are the awkward ones who look like a rabbit in the headlights when asked to give a brief talk about a subject which they inside out to a bunch of freshers who're still amazed that there's no register.Chi wrote: Especially academics, many of whom seem to lack social skills on a practically autistic scale.
To certain degrees I do agree with you. I think it's kinda cute and refreshing to have to explain to a guy something he should know, (mind you this is stereotypical) like science, math, video games, basketball. But the whole dumb blonde, absolutely no common sense deal is totally unattractive and gets aBazz wrote:I'm wondering if this works the other way round for the girls here? Do you find it cute when a guy fails to understand something? I doubt it somehow, ignorance in a guy is not an attractive feature.
expression from me everytime. So I guess I'm not as extreme as some guys can be. Super genius, no (hell, I'd feel inadequate). Intelligent (however this is defined) is an absolute prerequisite for me nowadays (and has been for many years). Approximately as smart as me (or smarter, even?) is desirable, too. That's just me, though (and says quite a bit about me, I guessLittleDrummerGirl wrote:this does not instantly mean super genius.
).Well, many of them do not. I've known people who are totally socially awkward, and would go out of their way to avoid other people.Bazz wrote:willing to socialise providing it takes place somewhere they would be anyway
'Ol Twinkle Toes for the next Prime Minister!Bazz wrote:she thinks Lionel Blair did a good job
It can't be any worse than "Age of Love" or "The Bachelor" or any of those stupid shows, so why not?LittleDrummerGirl wrote:How about I take the emo, the dumb hottie, and the ugly genius, and make a quirky reality show about the matter to see who can win my love?
